Kamangir (Archer)

Justification for Interference in Iraq

Kamangir | October 6, 2005 | Category Iran

 I was reading BBC. First compare these two phrases in BBC English and BBC Persian. Are BBC translators feared to transfer everything to Persian?

BBC English says: He said evidence led either to Iran or its Lebanese militant allies Hezbollah, although “we can’t be sure of this”.
He warned Iran that there could be “no justification” for interfering in Iraq.
Mr Blair was more diplomatic than the UK official who had first made the charge on Wednesday, but the allegation remained, the BBC’s Paul Reynolds says. Reed more here…

BBC Persian says:
تونی بلر در اين کنفرانس مطبوعاتی در پاسخ به سوالی درباره اين اتهامات که عواملی از ايران سلاح در اختيار پيکارجويان عراقی قرار داده اند، گفت اطمينان ندارد که اين اتهامات صحت داشته باشد اما هيچيک از همسايگان عراقی هيچگونه توجيهی برای دخالت در امور اين کشور ندارند
Read more here…

I was also so interested in the part of the article which is present in both translations:
He warned Iran that there could be “no justification” for interfering in Iraq. Though, in the Persian version, Iran is replaced with Iraq neighbours. The question is: Is this right specially reserved for UK and US? I can’t understand these guys.

Read this sentence :
تونی بلر نيز در اين کنفرانس مطبوعاتی گفت غرب بايد با اطمينان اعلام بدارد که نخواهد گذاشت شورشيان، آرزوی آزادی در ميان عراقيان را به ياس تبديل کنند.
It reads, Tony Blair expressed in his press conference that the west should urge that they would not allow insurgents to destroy the Iraqis’ dream of freedom.
The question is, how much will it cost for these poor hopeful Iraqis? They think we are kindergarten children!