Kamangir (Archer)

Did you know that Kamangir turns four tomorrow? See the classic "Hello World" dated October 17, 2008!

Hezbollah, The Mystery is Solved

Kamangir | July 25, 2006 | Category Iran

There are two very important questions regarding the current situation of Lebanon. One, is it true that there are two Lebanese authorities, namely the Lebanese government and Hezbollah? Two, is it true that Hezbollah is inspired and also supported by the Islamic Republic? During a short trip in Tehran the parliament speaker Haddade Adel solved both mysteries. He first visited the Lebanese embassy in Tehran. The first picture shows him with Adnan Mansour, the ambassador. Then, he visited the Hezbollah office in Tehran. The second picture shows him and Safieddin, Hezbollah’s representative in Tehran. So, basically, there are two Lebanese identities. From the photographs published in Mehr News Agency it appears that he met the two men in two different buildings (see) (see). Also, read the caption of the images in Fars (see). So, the first mystery is solved. Regarding the second question just imagine why Iranian supreme leader’s picture should be hanging in Hezbollah’s office. I am sure the Islamic Republic would not hesitate to help a few million dollars to its devotees.

Reader's Comments

Bill Channon | July 30th, 2006 at 1:01 pm
Again, as I commented on another post, I have always believed that LEbanon always belonged to the Lebanese. Perhaps a good question to ask is why does Hezbollah not leave Lebanon?
Bill Channon | July 30th, 2006 at 1:06 pm
Archer, if you read this, your question is a very good one. Why is it that religion seems to be so vulnerable to extremists who do not believe in the things that their religions preach. Christian, Muslim, Jewish extremists cannot possibly not know God
and seem to have no understanding of what God wants from us. Yet they, whichever religion, cause so much harm and damage.
kamangir | July 31st, 2006 at 11:56 am
Should I remember that Israel was there for a long time, too? Hey! Let’s talk more precisely and less politically.