<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Khomeini&#8217;s Fatwa Against Nuclear Weapons, Are You Serious?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kamangir.net/2006/09/29/khomeinis-fatwa-against-nuclear-weapons-are-you-serious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kamangir.net/2006/09/29/khomeinis-fatwa-against-nuclear-weapons-are-you-serious/</link>
	<description>An Iranian looking at Iran as a foreigner...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nuclear Ayatollah, Khomeini and Atomic Bomb &#171; Kamangir (Archer) - Ú©Ù…Ø§Ù†Ú¯ÛŒØ±</title>
		<link>http://kamangir.net/2006/09/29/khomeinis-fatwa-against-nuclear-weapons-are-you-serious/#comment-8317</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuclear Ayatollah, Khomeini and Atomic Bomb &#171; Kamangir (Archer) - Ú©Ù…Ø§Ù†Ú¯ÛŒØ±</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kamangir.net/2006/09/29/khomeinis-fatwa-against-nuclear-weapons-are-you-serious/#comment-8317</guid>
		<description>[...] See here (see) for details about Khomeini&#8217;s letter in which he advocates for accepting the Un reslution which ended the war with Iraq. BBC reported that Khomeini has mentioned &#8220;Atomic Weapons&#8221; there in the list of equipments asked for by the commanders. Though, all Iranian sources published the letter with &#8220;&#8230;&#8221; at the end of the list. Now, Entekhab has published the original letter in Khomeini&#8217;s handwriting (see). Guess what; he did talk about Atomic Weapons. Not very good times for the Iranian administration&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See here (see) for details about Khomeini&#8217;s letter in which he advocates for accepting the Un reslution which ended the war with Iraq. BBC reported that Khomeini has mentioned &#8220;Atomic Weapons&#8221; there in the list of equipments asked for by the commanders. Though, all Iranian sources published the letter with &#8220;&#8230;&#8221; at the end of the list. Now, Entekhab has published the original letter in Khomeini&#8217;s handwriting (see). Guess what; he did talk about Atomic Weapons. Not very good times for the Iranian administration&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iran:Ayatollah Khomeini&#8217;s letter and nuclear bomb</title>
		<link>http://kamangir.net/2006/09/29/khomeinis-fatwa-against-nuclear-weapons-are-you-serious/#comment-8316</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iran:Ayatollah Khomeini&#8217;s letter and nuclear bomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kamangir.net/2006/09/29/khomeinis-fatwa-against-nuclear-weapons-are-you-serious/#comment-8316</guid>
		<description>[...] Kamangir talks about Ayatollah Khomenii&#8217;s letter that was published after 18 years. We read in media, a letter from 1988 in which Iran&#8217;s top commander says Iran could need a nuclear bomb to win the war against Iraq has come to light in Tehran. The blogger adds I do not blame them; Iraq was using chemical weapons against Iranians. I say, letâ€™s be honest; Khomeini never issued a Fatwa against nuclear weapons, or at least he did not really mean nuclear arsenal is as bad as pork is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kamangir talks about Ayatollah Khomenii&#8217;s letter that was published after 18 years. We read in media, a letter from 1988 in which Iran&#8217;s top commander says Iran could need a nuclear bomb to win the war against Iraq has come to light in Tehran. The blogger adds I do not blame them; Iraq was using chemical weapons against Iranians. I say, letâ€™s be honest; Khomeini never issued a Fatwa against nuclear weapons, or at least he did not really mean nuclear arsenal is as bad as pork is. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
