Did you know that Kamangir turns four tomorrow? See the classic "Hello World" dated October 17, 2008!

Angry Memri

Kamangir | October 30, 2006 | Category Iran

A recent thread of discussions in Guardian Unlimited (see) shows another Israeli overreaction similar to what I was talking about before (see). I have had very similar experiences with Israeli friends, too (see). A few years ago, Brian Whitaker wrote a piece titled “Selective Memri” (see),

For some time now, I have been receiving small gifts from a generous institute in the United States. The gifts are high-quality translations of articles from Arabic newspapers which the institute sends to me by email every few days, entirely free-of-charge….The organisation that makes these translations and sends them out is the Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri), based in Washington…Memri’s purpose, according to its website, is to bridge the language gap between the west - where few speak Arabic - and the Middle East, by “providing timely translations of Arabic, Farsi, and Hebrew media”….Despite these high-minded statements, several things make me uneasy whenever I’m asked to look at a story circulated by Memri. First of all, it’s a rather mysterious organisation. Its website does not give the names of any people to contact, not even an office address….The second thing that makes me uneasy is that the stories selected by Memri for translation follow a familiar pattern: either they reflect badly on the character of Arabs or they in some way further the political agenda of Israel. I am not alone in this unease….Memri might, of course, argue that it is seeking to encourage moderation by highlighting the blatant examples of intolerance and extremism. But if so, one would expect it - for the sake of non-partisanship - to publicise extremist articles in the Hebrew media too….

He also adds,

The reason for Memri’s air of secrecy becomes clearer when we look at the people behind it. The co-founder and president of Memri, and the registered owner of its website, is an Israeli called Yigal Carmon….Mr - or rather, Colonel - Carmon spent 22 years in Israeli military intelligence and later served as counter-terrorism adviser to two Israeli prime ministers, Yitzhak Shamir and Yitzhak Rabin….

I see these as reasonable questions about an institute and its aims. This is how Memri responds (see),

Brian Whitaker’s Selective Memri is an example of selective journalism. Disregarding the Guardian’s own code - “A newspaper’s primary office is the gathering of news” - Whitaker has simply recycled inaccurate and previously published material. Two days before his piece appeared on the web, he called our Washington office to ask for the Arabic original of an article translated by Memri from the London daily Al-Hayat. He could have used this opportunity to check his facts. He chose not to do so. To start with, Memri is not a “mysterious organisation”. Our telephone number, fax and email appear on every dispatch. True, the office address is no longer posted on our website. Whitaker may scoff, but we have received threats from rightwing radicals in America. Had he asked, we would have provided him with our addresses in Washington, London, Berlin, Moscow and Jerusalem (as well as informing him that I retired from government office almost a decade ago)…. But then, facts might have got in the way of a “good story”…

I don’t get it. It is an obvious question to ask what Memri is exactly doing, with an ex-intelligence officer as its president. the bottom line is, it is all wrong, Memri is a decent academic institution. Why is Mr Carmon considering this a personal offense?

Thanks to Simon for the link.

Reader's Comments

  1. a from berlin |

    To be honest, I have the same feeling as Whitaker, because I know of a very similar story. I am volonteering with a magazine here in Germany, called INAMO (translated: information project of the Near and Middle East). INAMO was founded to give a platform to journalists from the ME (whole ME), to tell their side of the story, besides MSM (to put it very shortly). I find it a magazine with often very interesting background information that I did not have before.
    INAMO had also published information about MEMRI, which is along the lines of what Whitaker said. MEMRI tried to sue them for it. Following that, some minor things had to be changed in the article, but the central points and questions still remain and could not be proven to be wrong, as e.g. the central claim of selective information. I found that very interesting, too.

  2. kamangir |

    A,
    Thanks for the information. Do you have any idea why Memri is so hostile?

  3. a from berlin |

    Hi,
    to be honest the only thing I can do is guessing. If I would open up an information center, claiming to provide “objective” information, I probably would not be too happy, if other people would accuse me to be biased and imply that I am having other goals than just providing this objective information. (If you put all these above mentioned pieces of information together, you could easily get the impression, that someone tries knowingly and purposefully to use biased information to influence the political forming of opinion - which would be pretty much the exact opposite of what MEMRI claims to do). As I said, I would not like it either if someone tried to accuse me of that, or even only hinds at it. But I probably would rather try to proof those people wrong than to shut them up, in order to maintain my credibility - if I can proof it. And sometimes people get angry, if you hit a nerve. But it’s only a guess..

  4. ella |

    Kamangir

    Mr Whitaker wrote many pieces on ME, in one of his articles he wrote:
    Gandhi was a Hindu but readily incorporated other ideas into his philosophy. Like many Muslims today, he would undoubtedly have appreciated jihad, self-sacrifice and martyrdom as concepts, though not the methods that often accompany them.
    It, and other pieces like that make me think that although MEMRI might be selective, but so is Mr. Whitaker.

CommentComment